The Consumer Complaints Blog

Fighting the trained monkey in modern society.

November 16, 2006

Papa John’s Pizza. Why did you wake up my kids?

Filed under: Food Related — Editor @ 2:32 pm

What is wrong with Papa John’s Pizza?
Let’s review:

This began on November 6, 2006…

I “plan ahead” ordered two pizzas, four hours early, yet received two cold pizzas an hour late and no offer of compensation when calling the location to complain.

In a gesture of “good will”, the delivery person showed up to our dimly lighted house at 830pm two hours after the pizzas finally arrived, to drop off 4 Cokes (btw, we only drink Diet Coke), in the process woke up my kids and dogs.

I send an email to Papa John’s to complain and get a format email in response suggesting I take it up on a local level.

I explain that I have done that already with no satisfactory resolution.

Shane Little, a franchisee in Tallahassee, Florida calls me three days later and we exchange several voice mails. When we finally speak on the phone, he explains that he is actually in Florida and was forwarded my complaint in error but understands my frustration, assuring me someone will get in touch with me who can help.

Still waiting. Welcome to my country. This is turning in to “service” economy–good luck! Good news is this is only a $24 meal, nothing more.

Thanks?

Mike Gelman
Silver Spring MD

Disclaimer
This article was submitted by one of our readers. Penciltrick cannot make any claims as to its authenticity but the article was accepted on a good faith belief that it is an accurate and truthful account of the events listed.

November 10, 2006

Getting Shafted in the Great White North by Ontera

Filed under: Service Based — Editor @ 3:07 pm

Maybe I am just wasting your time, but even up here in Northern Ontario we have complaint issues, and no place to post them. I thought I would give your site a try. I apologize if this is not the type of complaint that you wish to post on your site, and please do not post if you feel it doesn’t fit your criteria.

Up here in the great white north, we only have 2 choices for long distance providers – Northern Telephone and Ontera, and other than the 200 phone numbers in our small town, everything is long distance. We had been with Ontera for the last several years.

In July of this year, our long distance service was interrupted. I called to find out what the problem was, and were told that it had been cut off due to an unpaid bill which belonged to a different phone number. I complained that the second number was not even in our name, and we had no control of the account, nor did we receive billing for it. The extremely efficient (!) operator to whom I was speaking informed me that because we shared a post office box (the only way to get our mail here in a small town, other than general delivery, and there is a waiting list to get a box number) with the person responsible for the bill (we are related, though we live over 17 km. apart) that we were therefore responsible to pay for the outstanding bill of $12.54.

I asked how I could be sure if this amount was even legitimate when:
1. We have never had access, information or communication regarding this bill, and
2. The phone number had been reassigned about one year ago to another customer.

She informed me that all of their information comes from Northern Telephone (for addressing) and that was why our service was cut off to enforce payment on this outstanding amount. Obviously if you share a mailing address, you must live in the same location, right? Well, not up here! They could get the mailing information from the other company, but not the physical locations of the actual telephones! Amazing efficiency. Even though it was not our phone number, our service was cut off, and no arguments could change the decisions of the company.

I hung up, extremely upset, and called my husband and told him what the issue was. Because we run a farm, it was imperative that our service be reconnected as soon as possible, regardless of the costs. So, because I had no choice and no other options, I called Ontera back and offered (under duress, you understand) to pay the outstanding bill in order to reconnect our service. Once that transaction was done, I was then informed that we would have to pay another $75.00 reconnection fee! I was livid and almost yelling into the phone that IT WAS NOT OUR PROBLEM, OUR BILL OR OUR PHONE! I was quickly put on hold, which was probably the smart thing to do, before I exploded! When she returned, I was informed that the reconnection fee would be waived in this case – how totally generous of them.

My daughter worked for a collection agency at one time, and they will not take collections under $20.00, and I know that all businesses have bad debt write-offs, so I wonder why Ontera would hold innocent parties liable for accounts that do not belong to them, based solely on a post office box number which is shared. By this logic, and Rural Route or General Delivery address holders could be held liable to pay for outstanding bills of another Rural Route or Gen. Del. customer. That is a little scary for all rural customers.

I emailed to Ontera with a complaint letter, which I followed up with a regular mail copy. I have heard nothing from the company, either by letter or by phone call. I am still upset by this whole issue, and have been telling everyone that I know exactly how we were treated by Ontera. I know that they pride themselves on being a Northern company, serving the needs of the North, but that is not how I see it. They are a company who don’t care about their northern customers, and are willing to “steal” from other customers to feed their bottom line.

Sorry to have been long-winded, but I hope that your site can help to address unfair billing issues like this one. Thank you for your time.

Marilyn Wilkinson
Box 159
Elk Lake, Ontario P0J 1G0

Disclaimer
This article was submitted by one of our readers. Penciltrick cannot make any claims as to its authenticity but the article was accepted on a good faith belief that it is an accurate and truthful account of the events listed.

August 13, 2006

Soccer at The Docks in Toronto

Filed under: Service Based — Editor @ 2:51 am

I signed my 10 year son up for one week of soccer and fun at Soccerworld @ The Docks. I registered online on April 19, 2006. My payment was processed that day for $267.50. The website shows its last update Feb 1 2006 and is still that current.

It promised:

  • Outstanding instruction for girls/boys
  • Ages 6-16 from Conquest Coaching Staff
  • Official Soccerworld Camp t-shirt and ball
  • Personal “Skills Evaluation” (Written by camper’s Coach) and workout calender
  • Emphasis on fundamentals, sportsmanship
  • And team play

The list of Coaching staff was impressive, the director is the Head of women’s soccer program at UofT. The other coaches were also from UofT. This is what was delivered:

  • Campers were to be dropped of at Spike’s Clubhouse … it’s a bar!
  • NONE of the coaches were in attendance during the week.
  • No “official” camp t-shirt. My son received an adult sized shirt with two company names on it that meant nothing and just advertising them.
  • No ball.
  • No personal skills evaluation.
  • AND on the last day some children received a ball or hat for ‘good sportsmanship’ or ‘participation’.
  • No mention had been made the first day that some prizes would be given for these things.

I complained via email on Day 2 as my son had come home Monday night with a severe burn on his face and body from swimming without a shirt and sunscreen. There is no shelter at the docks and the counsellors did not enforce that sunscreen be applied to shirtless bodies. I had a telephone promptly after my complaint email. We discussed the burn. We discussed that when our son was dropped off to a young cousellor in flip flops that there wasn’t a sign in sheet. All other camps we attend duly mark off the name and we can leave with assurance that he is accounted for especially next to Lake Ontario.

On Friday after a disappointing week learning that nary one coach was ever in attendance during the week and that his most fun he had was go-karting in the week… I marched over to the trailer to speak in person to the director of the camp. He thought my expectations for the camp were too high. My expectations were what they printed online and what I paid for online. I feel they were misrepresenting the camp and false advertising.

My son was disappointed that we did not get a new soccer ball as we expected. I feel I paid too much and received too little. I’m glad I only took my son for one week and I will tell my friends not to make the same mistake. I should have called and asked more questions instead I believed what I read online.

I hope this might help others.

Signed,
janet joy wilson

Disclaimer
This article was submitted by one of our readers. Penciltrick cannot make any claims as to its authenticity but the article was accepted on a good faith belief that it is an accurate and truthful account of the events listed.

March 19, 2006

Consumer Protection Sites in Canada

Filed under: Resources — Editor @ 4:14 pm

Even though we think that most of these agencies have little or no power. Well, let’s be honest. We actually think they are a huge joke. Kind of like the life jackets on airplanes. Ever seen footage of a plane hitting the water? Not exactly a smooth landing…

In any case. We thought it would be nice to put together a list of places people can try to exercise their rights. We’ve tried in the past without much success but there is strength in numbers.

Please let us know if there are any problems with the links.

All Industries
Better Business Bureau(s)

Automobile

Canadian Motor Vehicle Arbitration Plan

Motor Vehicle Industry Council (Alberta)

Motor Vehicle Industry Council (Ontario)

Automobile Protection Association

Automobile Consumer Coalition

Advertising and Marketing

Advertising Standards Canada

Canadian Marketing Association

Competition Bureau

The Bereavement Register

Communications (Radio, Television, Telephone, etc.)

Cable Television Standards Council

Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission

Canadian Broadcast Standards Council

Energy, Gas, Electricity

Ontario Energy Board

Quebec Energy Board / Régie de l’énergie Québec

Centre for Energy

Independent Electricity Market Operator

Energy Shop (energy price comparisons)

Financial Services

Financial Consumers Agency of Canada

Centre for the Financial Services Ombudsnetwork

Ombudsman for Banking Services and Investments

Canadian Bankers Association — Ombudsman

Financial Services Commission of Ontario

Financial Planners Standards Council (look under “Enforcement”)

Investment Dealers Association

Canadian Payments Association

Office of the Superintendant of Financial Institutions

Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy

Government of Canada Financial Services Links

Food

Canadian Food Inspection Agency – Report a Food Complaint

Canadian Food Inspection Agency — Consumer Information

Canadian Partnership for Food Safety Information Education

Health and Safety

Health Canada — Product Reporting

Health Canada — Consumer Product Safety

Health Canada — Consumer and Public Involvement

Health Canada — Health Protection Consumer Reports

Canadian Toy Testing Council

Pest Management Regulatory Agency

Housing, Building and Construction

Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation

Canadian Home Builders Association

Insurance

General Insurance Ombudservice

Canadian Life and Health Insurance Association

Financial Services Commission of Ontario

Registered Insurance Brokers of Ontario

Provincial Insurance Council (Alberta)

Provincial Insurance Council (British Columbia)

Provincial Insurance Council (Manitoba)

Provincial Insurance Council (Saskatchewan)

Canadian Council of Insurance Regulators

Insurance Canada — Consumer Information

Privacy

Privacy Commissioner of Canada

Travel and Transportation

Air Travel Complaints Commission

Canadian Transportation Agency

Kiosk Mobilia. Refund and bad service nightmare?

Filed under: Retail — Editor @ 3:28 pm

Stay away from Kiosk Mobilia! If you have a problem it will take years to resolve and months to get your refund.

This is a long saga that started in September 2004 with the placement of an order for 8 chairs, delivery promised in November 2004. We sold our dining room set in early November. The chairs arrived in January 2005 (Christmas on borrowed chairs), colour did not match wood sample in showroom (sample book has wood samples that are about 1/2 inch by 1/2 inch.

Kiosk had a sale on in January – and the reduced sale price came close to exceeding the restocking charge (or so we thought!) Funny thing – they have decided to base the restocking charge on the full regular price, not the price you pay – so they are really making money here. None of this is on the order form nor are you told before completing the purchase!

So the second lot was ordered in January. Based on advice from the salesperson, a custom colour was ordered and we paid to FedEx a wood sample to Spain. The finally arrived towards the end of April. What a waste of time – the chairs were way off colour and totally unacceptable. Kiosk was going to get the chairs sprayed in Toronto, but after four trips to their refinisher, over 8 hours of wasted time, several months of chasing, and then the refinisher losing the wood sample, we gave up.

So in September 2005, the third lot was ordered with delivery promised again for early November. To be totally safe we went with colour 39 – and a standard fabric. They finally arrived the first week in December, before Christmas – in a colour that was not even in the sample book and teak orange instead of dark brown walnut colour due to an ordering error by Kiosk staff. Kiosk Mobilia committed to getting them sprayed for Christmas – and as usual did not deliver on their commitment – we hosted Christmas dinner on a mishmash of chairs as we did not have enough for our guests.

In January 2006, the sprayed chairs finally arrived – with drips/runs in the staining, and areas on every chair that were not sprayed. We gave up – and guess what.

We got stung for over $400 on the refund – despite the fact that their staff made the ordering errors. If the last lot was delivered as ordered, we would have ended up paying a couple of hundred more than our original order (still less than full price), and this would not have been a problem.

If we had had accurate advice from staff to start with, this whole process would never have been started. It is totally unethical for a company to base their restocking charge on the full retail – when you pay a sale price and not to tell you up front. Just for example – with a $500 chair on sale for $375- your restocking charge is $100 instead of $75 – a lot when you add up the cost of several chairs.

We got bad advice, poor service, total failure to get orders correct and deliveries on time, and then to cap it all off – when the owner – Robert Sidi and I made jointly made the decision on January 26 to stop trying. To get our refund took nearly two months, 28 phone calls (documented with times),8 detailed emails and finally at the end of February a comment to a store manager that we would cause a scene in the store to get action.

In negotiating the refund – the owner refused to speak to us despite the fact that we were always polite, did not swear, did not yell. It was a horrid frustration to have to deal with staff who have no authority to make a decision – so instead of one phone call – it was always two or three. The refund was reduced by the overpriced restocking fees). I figure – getting the refund took over 20 hours of my time – totally unacceptable. We finally got the money on March 16 – and we had to pick up the cheque.

So we went without dining room chairs for 18 months, spent easily over 100 hours on the order by the time you include going to the store several times, phone calls to chase the deliveries, dealing with deliveries, refinisher etc, problems in getting the refund, and paid $400 for the privilege of ending up with nothing.

Just sign us – Totally unhappy FORMER customer – we will never deal with them again and will encourage all our associates and our adult children and their friends to avoid them too!

Disclaimer
This article was submitted by one of our readers. Penciltrick cannot make any claims as to its authenticity but the article was accepted on a good faith belief that it is an accurate and truthful account of the events listed.

« Previous PageNext Page »